When I bought my first Nexus phone, the Galaxy Nexus, I was in pure Android heaven. Hardware will be released after that kernel release and some accessory hardware will not have the needed software to interface. However, out-of-the-box is not the end-all-be-all. In fact, I would say that Linux now offers a better out-of-the-box experience than Windows or Mac for basic hardware detection. Linux has come a long way regarding hardware compatibility. However, conversely, Linux users have plenty to be envious of - Microsoft Office, Adobe Photoshop, Netflix support and much more. Overall, there are no true killer Linux applications that a Windows user would lust over. This lead to headaches and disappointment and in the end he had to return the printer (I later installed Windows 7 at his request and installed the printer for him). Of course, the HP setup CD-ROM did not support Linux and setting up a networked printer manually was not something he knew how to do. He wanted a wireless one so he could put the printer in another room. However, one day his printer broke so he had to go to the store to buy another. I figured, since he lives in the browser, a Linux desktop with Google Chrome would be ideal and safe. There is no way around it - to properly edit a video and create something professional, you must use Windows or Mac.Ī good example of software woe is, to protect my father from malware, I built him a computer using Linux Mint. While Linux distributions offer wonderful photo-managing and editing, video-editing is poor to non-existent. Open-source ideology be damned, Microsoft Office will create more compatible files and lead to a more successful employee. However, true professionals cannot trust their careers and reputations to alternative software. For basic users, these alternatives may work (and work well). This is a sore subject for many, as Linux-purists and loyalist will eagerly point you to wonderful alternatives that can be acceptable. How can a user master Linux and become an expert when an unfamiliar package manager can cause a beginner-like regression? However, if they do stray, they will be in for a rude awakening and frustration when the commands they know and love no longer work. These package managers use entirely different commands which can be confusing.įor the most part, that is fine if they never stray from Ubuntu. There are many other managers such as YUM and Pacman. Sadly, these new Linux users will think the apt package manager is the only package manager. In the terminal or on the command-line, these users will learn the apt package manager commands, as that is what Ubuntu uses. This should not take away from Ubuntu it is a testament to its smart design and ease of use. Too many package managers makes Linux hard to learn and master A screenshot of an OS X or Windows desktop is immediately recognizable the countless Linux desktops? Not so much.Ĥ. If a user seeking help says they are on Ubuntu, you cannot be sure that they are on Unity - they may be on KDE, Gnome or something else which ultimately can lead to confusion.Ī lack of familiarity and shared experiences fragments users since they do not have a shared rallying point. You see, from a trouble-shooting perspective, it is almost impossible to direct a Linux user over the phone or instant-messenger by just knowing their distribution. While many may point to the freedom of user-interface choice as a positive (and it can be), I would also argue that it is a negative. In other words, the community is vastly divided by tribal identity. all of which have associated "fan-boys". However, with Linux, there is also XFCE, Unity, Cinnamon, etc. Unfortunately, in the Linux community, this story is all too common. I am a big fan of the Gnome desktop environment and conversely I dislike KDE (but I do respect it). Different desktop managers lead to a fragmented experience
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |